I recently had a discussion on twitter that was less than supportive and I was really frustrated with the way in which the conversation transpired. As a result, I wanted to create a post that dealt with both the influence and power of social media as well as break down the conversation in question, which in my mind tried to define ‘The Filmmaker’ in a very narrow-minded way.
The Story
Normally I try and steer clear of confrontation but when an unnamed individual on twitter went to the extent of personally attacking the credibility of a good friend, I felt that something needed to be said. Big mistake.
The Power / Influence of Social Media
Social media is a powerful behemoth that is both good and bad.
- The Good
- A place to find helpful information
- A place to find support and encouragement
- A place to find constructive criticism
- A place for professional development
- A place for developing and maintaining relationships, both personal and business
- The Bad
- A place to say and do negative things without any accountability
- The loss of human interaction
- The Troll
The lack of accountability is by far the most detrimental factor when it comes to social media. People feel they can hide behind a computer without being accountable for their actions. This comes in the form of both cyber bullies and trolls. The conversation after I reached out in defence can be seen in the image below.
Filmmaking by the Traditional Definition
It is clear that since the advent of film, the model has changed and continues to do so. As seen in the image, it seems that some have yet to embrace this evolution that has occurred. Before I dig deeper into what a filmmaker is, let’s start by looking at the traditional definition of both filmmaking and the filmmaker.
Filmmaking is the process of making a film. Filmmaking involves a number of discrete stages including an initial story, idea, or commission, through scriptwriting, casting, shooting, editing, and screening the finished product before an audience that may result in a film release and exhibition. Filmmaking takes place in many places around the world in a range of economic, social, and political contexts, and using a variety of technologies and cinematic techniques. Typically, it involves a large number of people, and can take from a few months to several years to complete.
The Filmmaker by the Traditional Definition
A person who directs or produces movies for the theater or television.
The Breakdown
By each of these definitions, I can, ‘in a very limited way’, see where the person on the right could be coming from. However, I have a problem with the way in which this individual not only questioned our credibility as artists but also as filmmakers. Everyone is entitled to an opinion but there is never a need to judge others and their chosen profession, especially when they are judging on an extremely superficial level.
From my understanding of the conversation on the right, anyone who produces music videos, training/educational videos, wedding videos, or people who have had their work seen as ‘critically acclaimed’, are not filmmakers. I think this classification is extremely unfair AND inaccurate.
However, for the ones that do view perspectives on the right as accurate, my question is then, who is the ‘filmmaker’ in the purest form? The producer? The director? What if the producer is also the director? What about the DP who also edits, who is a writer, and also promotes the project? If the project is brought to life in a week, is it not a film? All of these questions need to be accounted for as per the definition as seen in the conversation.
A Change in Audience Trends
Traditionally, a film is broken down into departments, where each individual is responsible for a given task. These teams come together with a common goal to produce a film. With the transition from the studio system, these models are changing and individuals are widening their skill-sets to meet the change in audience trends.
According to MSNBC,
“the internet has passed television in the amount of time spent a week, the Web portal and media firm found in a report called “Born to Be Wired” released Thursday. Young people, ages 13-24, spend an average of 16.7 hours a week online, excluding e-mail, compared to 13.6 hours watching TV. After TV viewing, they listened to radio for 12 hours, talked on the phone for 7.7 hours and spent six hours reading books and magazines for personal entertainment”.
As for movie theatre attendance, the Daily Mail states that,
“[a]ttendance at movie theatres is at a 25-year low, with young consumers – those who often see the most films – down 40 per cent since 2002”.
With these stats, it is clear to see that the landscape is changing and as a result, these definitions need to be updated – as well as the perspectives of individuals stuck in the old studio system.
Now what does this mean? In it’s simplest form, this clearly shows that more work is being produced for the web… and as such, these narrow-minded viewpoints need to be updated.
Redefining for the Close-Minded / Conclusion
Now before I lay out what I perceive as a more accurate definition of what a filmmaker is, I must clarify that these are just my perspectives. It is clear that some believe that people like me are, ‘an insult to the real film makers out there’.
With the transition for the traditional studio system of specialization, many filmmakers are starting to wear multiple hats and as a result, these narrow definitions of the filmmaker need to be widened.
I believe filmmakers are individuals who attempt to tell a story in a visual way, no matter the format and no matter the audience. Our goals as filmmakers is to entertain, educate and make viewers question something about the way in which they live their lives. If you produce educational videos, short form documentaries, wedding videos, corporate videos, YOU ARE A FILMMAKER. To say otherwise is just crazy! For those of you that may see this an inaccurate, I would gladly accept any definition that would better classify the well-rounded camera holding script-writing producing sound recordist.
Agree? Disagree? Would love to hear your thoughts in the comment section below.
This guy really got under your skin Preston. But the good thing about it, is it got you to write this post…;-) I fully agree with you on your thoughts but like they say, sometimes you have to fight fire with fire and in the case of narrow minded people you need (in my opinion) to address them in the narrow minded manner. Complicated dissertations are difficult to grasp for narrow minded people. So my reply to this guy would have been: Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary definition of Filmmaker: One who makes motion pictures.
Why make things complicated when they can be so simple….;-)
Well put! That would have been an easier solution. :)
You don’t see me on his web-site, do ya! Keep up the good work. Where is the video on the pocket jib traveler? You should be finishing that up instead of worrying about this little stuff. Love your work, no matter what he wants to call you!
Haha! Thanks for your kind words :). Been a few people with the same perspective so just wanted to address it for future people with the same crummy attitude. I will be working on the pj traveler in a week and hopefully I’ll have it posted in two!
Hey,
Good article! I’ll have to agree with your definition of filmmaking, just because it makes more sense and it is more adapted to today’s reality!
However, your “twitter friend” would probably ask you to define the limit of the “not-so-pure” filmmaker! With all the affordable video tools and all the user generated content on the web, where is the limit between your definition of filmmaker and the typical Youtube user that simply posts stupid videos with millions of views of friends doing funny stuff
Would they be considered Filmmakers? What about the cheap guitar tutorials? What about all these iPhone shots of a storm?
Would like to hear you on that!
Nice reading you!
-Dom
TBH, if these youtube creators etc. believe they are filmmakers, that is totally fine by me! :)
Love your work Preston, keep up the good work.
Nobilis Bellator provides a sensible way to avoid a debate by providing the definition outlined by a Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary
Might have to suggest this approach also in the future grey areas in many fields of art
I think most people get bogged down in language. At the end of the day, it doesn’t really matter too much if one person thinks he is a filmmaker, and another disagrees. If he (or she) enjoys what they are doing, then leave them to it :)
Some people just like to moan, and online is the perfect place as they have the safety and security of the computer. Just learn to filter them out and ignore them. It takes more effort to reply to them then it does to just ignore them. (Incidentally if nobody ever replied, they would end up getting bored and would stop being a dick).
Anyway keep up posting the good stuff, looking forward to the next RAW timelapse tutorial!
Cheers! Yeah, I agree. Would have been easier to ignore for sure. Hope to have the next instalment out soon.
awesome, any idea when ‘soon’ is? :)
Within the next few weeks.
Preston, I am an early adopter of technology and have been on forums since we had 1200 baud dialup. One thing that I learned a long time ago is that you can Never, Ever, win a conversation/disagreement in an online medium. When you receive a negative comment, just ignore it. It usually a jealous person or someone insecure with their own abilities. Think of it this way, if they have time to throw their energy at that BS, they aren’t working!!!
Very good point and thanks for your comments!
Hi Preston,totally agree with all you are saying. To keep it simple I have been a shooter for over 30 years mainly TV but also many videos and docos. I try to pass on what I know to anyone who wants to learn, through classes and an online camera course. I have also put a few simple tips on YouTube and sometimes get smart comments trying to get me to react. I completely leave them alone, no reaction works. Everybody is at a different point in their storytelling experience and also their life experience so you can never deliver a message that will connect with all.Ignore the trolls. If you are interested my site is video-camera-courses.com keep up the great work with your site. Geoff
Thanks so much for sharing your experiences. Totally agree with you. Have had a fair share of these types of people and just wanted to draft up a post to forward to future ‘characters’ :). Great work on your site. There is some killer info on it!
Its all semantics really. I’ve often been referred to as a “Filmer” but I’ve never used film! The person in question obviously feels protective of the term and has given a pretty emotional response.
I dislike having to deal with the terminology in this area: videographer = “the practice or art of recording images with a video camera” so as I use a DLSR (7D which is still LOVE) am I’m not a videographer then? And not a filmer? Not a cinematographer either? Its confusing really.
What term do I use? On my business card I put “Head Honcho” figured its my company I could have what ever I wanted!
In the mean time I just like to create moving images for work and for fun!
Totally semantics! Love your title :). When are you back in Canada???
Possibly not any time soon… currently in Japan. Here is an edit from Japan. https://vimeo.com/58813346 it is a random day off, just for fun, inc snowboarding and a road trip to Otaru. Tried some shooting on Glidecam with a 50mm (on 7d so kinda 80mm) and loved the look, although was not balanced for it. Just realized in my “on line presence” I have called myself: Filmmaker/cinematographer/director/producer/photographer/snowboarder/timelapse addict! Guess I’m leaving myself wide open for criticism, however, I feel play all of these role wrapped up into one. Was thinking that maybe the person from twitter could be called “Movie maker” as people GO to the MOVIES… but only if critically acclaimed of course! ;)
I think it’s fair to say there’s a dividing line in this issue, though, and for me that line is story.
Maybe I’m just old skool but there is still something heightened or elevated about the term “film” that keeps me from applying it to just any old thing I point a camera at. A piece that, for instance, shows folks how to use an iPhone app or something may be extremely well done–but I wouldn’t consider that a film unless it were telling a story first and providing an app demo as an ancillary secondary element. Just an example.
Novelists often write other things than novels. Sometimes they write short stories. Poems. Grocery lists. All of those may be important, needful writings. Especially the grocery lists. But they’re not all novels, nor do we need them to be.
So perhaps it’s OK for us to be filmmakers who make films occasionally, yes, but who sometimes just shoot test shots or product demo videos, etc.
While I don’t agree with the person’s comments or tactics on Twitter, I can see a little of why some purists get tripped up by the “broadening” of the filmmaker definition.
Totally get where you are coming from. I still think that even if you are only producing things such as product demo’s that you are still a filmmaker as you are telling the story of the product ;). Anyone who thinks they are a filmmaker is a filmmaker in my books!
[…] By traditional definition a filmmaker is “A person who directs or produces movies for the theater or television.” However, I prefer the new, more enlightened definition I read recently on Preston Kanak’s blog: […]